Kanger's choices in automated reasoning

نویسنده

  • Anatoli Degtyarev
چکیده

Automated deduction, or automated theorem proving is a branch of science that deals with automatic search for a proof. The contribution of Kanger to automated deduction is well-recognized. His monograph 1957] introduced a calculus LC, which was one of the rst calculi intended for automated proof-search. His article 1963] was later republished as Kanger 1983] in the collection of \classical papers on computational logic". Kanger's 1963] (and also 1959]) calculi used some interesting features that have not been noted for a number of years, and the importance of which in the area of automated deduction has been recognized only much later. Kanger 1963] gives no proofs and uses very succinct presentation. Automated deduction is an area in which very subtle changes in deenitions and assertions may lead to inconsistent conclusions. Kanger's 1963] area was theorem proving in sequent calculi with equality and function symbols. Most papers published in this area before 1995 contained serious mistakes, except for Kanger's. Now, when we are equipped with the impressive amount of techniques developed in this area, we are amazed with the incredible intuition of Kanger that allowed him to choose elegant, interesting (and correct) solutions among many possible choices. This article explains these choices and their place in modern automated deduction. 1 j = ` The title of this section j = ` is the logo of the Association for Logic Programming: truth is equivalent to provability. The equivalence of validity and provability for classical logic was proved by GG odel 1930] and is known as GG odel's completeness theorem. The notions of truth and validity in logic are formulated as semantical properties, while the notion of provability is deened in a purely syntactical way, so there seems to be a gap between the two notions. In 1955{1957 several new proofs of GG odel's completeness theorem appeared Beth 1955, Hintikka 1955, Sch utte 1956, Kanger 1957] in which model theory and proof theory were connected in a very natural manner. They are based 1

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Hybridization in Question Answering Systems

Question answering systems can benefit from the incorporation of a broad range of technologies, including natural language processing, machine learning, information retrieval, knowledge representation, and automated reasoning. We have designed an architecture that identifies the essential roles of components in a question answering system. This architecture greatly facilitates experimentation b...

متن کامل

An Approach for Explaining Reasoning on the Diet Domain

We are conducting a project involving automatic reasoning and natural language generation in the domain of diet management. In this paper we describe the main issues related to the automatic reasoning mechanisms for diet management purposes and we present the message generation techniques designed to support the users in managing their dietary choices. In particular, this paper has two main goa...

متن کامل

Managing the Life Cycle of Plans

The scalability of recent planning algorithms allows developers to automate planning tasks, which so far have been reserved to humans. However in real-world applications, synthesizing a plan is just the beginning of a complex life-cycle management process. Plans must be organized in large collections, where they can be grouped along different purposes and are amenable to the search, inspection,...

متن کامل

Managing Design Change with Functional Blueprints

Long-lived complex electromechanical systems, such as vehicles or industrial machinery, often need to be adapted for new uses or new environments. Adapting the design for such a system is frequently complicated by the fact that they are often tightly integrated, such that any change will have consequences throughout the design, and must take many different aspects of the system into considerati...

متن کامل

Distributed Constraint Handling and Optimization

Constraints pervade our everyday lives and are usually perceived as elements that limit solutions to the problems that we face (e.g., the choices we make everyday are typically constrained by limited money or time). However, from a computational point of view, constraints are key components for efficiently solving hard problems. In fact, constraints encode knowledge about the problem at hand, a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007